Skip to content
Back to Blog
Bio
2026-10-197 min read2

Retraining Your AI Medical Device No Longer Means a New Change Approval Every Time — Korea's July 27 Digital Medical Product Notice Amendment, the Shift to Negative Change Regulation, and How Small Medical AI/SaMD Firms Should Classify Updates and Prepare Change Management Plans (2026)

A guide to Korea's July 27 digital medical product notice amendment and the shift to negative change regulation, covering how to tell whether AI model retraining needs a change approval and how to prepare a change management plan.

KITIM Consulting Team

What Changed — The July 27 Digital Medical Product Notice Amendment

On July 27, 2026, Korea's Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) amended its Notice on the Approval, Certification, Notification, Review and Evaluation of Digital Medical Products. This amendment does not create new rules for updating AI medical devices. It mostly aligns the Notice with higher-level regulations that had already changed. The sequence looks like this:

  • January 23, 2026: Enforcement Rule of the Digital Medical Products Act amended: The "significant changes" for digital medical device software and the labeling items for AI-enabled software were moved up into the Enforcement Rule
  • July 27: Notice amended: MFDS removed those items from the Notice because they now sit in the Enforcement Rule. It also analyzed roughly 1,000 approval and review cases to set concrete criteria for when clinical trial data is required or can be waived. The quality management system special track now covers unclassified products, not just Class 2. The real-world use special track was extended from one year to up to three years
  • Shift to negative regulation for medical device change approvals: In a March 3 press briefing, MFDS said it would stop listing "minor changes." Instead it would spell out only "significant changes" and let companies manage everything else themselves. At that point, however, this was a proposed amendment to the Enforcement Rule of the Medical Devices Act. Check the National Law Information Center to confirm whether it has been promulgated and is in force
  • Updates That Need a Change Approval — and Those That Don't

    The core of the negative approach: if a change is not significant, you manage it yourself without a change approval. According to press reports, AI retraining also needs no change approval unless it counts as a significant change. In practice, a first-pass assessment might look like this:

    | Type of update | Likely outcome |

    |---|---|

    | UI improvements, bug fixes, refactoring with no performance impact | Likely self-managed |

    | Retraining with added data within the same intended use and input data scope | Self-managed after checking it is not a significant change |

    | Adding new input types, such as a new imaging device or modality | Likely a significant change |

    | Expanding indications or changing intended use (e.g., diagnosis to prediction) | Significant change |

    | Changing the algorithm structure (e.g., replacing the model architecture) | Likely a significant change |

    These are examples only. The Enforcement Rule text is the final authority. Self-managed changes still have to be documented and validated. If you cannot produce that evidence during a post-market inspection, the burden only grows.

    Change Management Plans — Defining Update Scope at Approval

    For digital medical devices, a change management plan can be approved together with the device. It describes anticipated software changes, how they will be validated, and their impact on safety and effectiveness. Changes within the approved scope can then go into the product without a separate approval. The idea mirrors the US FDA's Predetermined Change Control Plan (PCCP).

    A plan should cover at least:

  • Change types and scope: retraining frequency and limits on which parameters may change
  • Retraining data criteria: sources, labeling procedures, and data distribution requirements
  • Performance validation: metrics such as sensitivity and specificity, with minimum acceptance thresholds
  • Deployment and rollback: how to revert to the previous version if a release falls short
  • Confirm which products are eligible and which forms to use in the current MFDS guidance.

    Practical Preparation for Small Medical AI Firms

  • Revise your change classification SOP: document a significant/non-significant checklist and name who makes the call
  • Track data and performance history: keep retraining dataset versions, performance monitoring metrics, and validation reports for each release
  • Connect GMP and cybersecurity: fold the change process into your quality management system documents and cybersecurity requirements
  • Link it to your launch strategy: if you also use the innovative medical device designation or the immediate market entry pathway for new medical technologies, you can plan post-approval update costs from the start
  • How KITIM Can Help

    KITIM advises on change classification SOPs and change management plans, and provides regulatory strategy consulting. We also help digital health and medical AI companies connect with relevant government R&D programs. If you are unsure whether your next model update needs a change approval, contact the KITIM consulting team. We will work with you on decision criteria and a preparation timeline that fit your product.

    Digital Medical Products ActMedical Device SoftwareChange ApprovalNegative RegulationAI RetrainingChange Management PlanSaMDMFDS Notice
    매일 자동 업데이트

    이 분야 정부지원사업, AI가 찾아드립니다

    3분 기업진단만 완료하면 귀사에 맞는 공고를 적합도 점수와 함께 추천합니다. 무료입니다.

    AI 맞춤 공고 무료로 받기

    Need Consulting?

    Our technology innovation consultants will propose the optimal solution for your company.