Skip to content
Back to Blog
ESG
2026-09-158 min read0

EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) Takes Effect — Packaging Minimization, Recycled Content, and Authorised Representative Requirements for Korean SME Exporters

With the EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) applying generally since 12 August 2026, restricted substances and EPR obligations are now live for Korean SME exporters. This guide separates immediate from phased requirements and covers Authorised Representative structures, packaging data systems, and a 90-day compliance roadmap.

KITIM Consulting Team

Your Product Passed Certification — So Why Is the Box the Problem?

The EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR, Regulation (EU) 2025/40) entered into force on 11 February 2025 and has applied generally since 12 August 2026. This is not a rule to prepare for — it is already in effect.

The most consequential change is its legal form. The previous Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive (94/62/EC) was a *Directive*, so requirements varied slightly as each Member State transposed it into national law. PPWR is a *Regulation*, which means it applies directly across the entire EU without national implementing legislation. And it applies not only to goods produced within the EU but equally to the packaging of imported products.

This is where Korean SME exporters most often get caught out: the regulated object is not the *product* but the *packaging*. Companies that carefully secured CE marking and product safety certification are increasingly receiving shipment holds from EU importers over the outer carton, cushioning material, labels, or tape.

Nor is the scope limited to direct exporters. OEM and ODM suppliers shipping to EU buyers will receive packaging documentation requests from their importers. Even where they are not the legally obligated party, they must produce substantively the same data.

Separate What Applies Now From What Applies Later

To avoid both over-reacting and under-reacting, start by sorting obligations by application date.

Already in force

  • Substances of Concern minimisation: the obligation to minimise Substances of Concern has applied to all packaging since 12 August 2026. Weight and volume minimisation, the ban on double walls and false bottoms (Article 10) and the 50% empty space ratio cap (Article 24) apply from 1 January 2030; until then the essential requirements of the old Packaging Directive continue to apply on a transitional basis
  • Restricted substances: the four heavy metals (lead, cadmium, mercury, hexavalent chromium) capped at a combined 100 ppm, with tightened PFAS controls. Securing test reports is effectively the prerequisite for everything else
  • Phased obligations

    | Requirement | Application date | Current status |

    |-------------|------------------|----------------|

    | Recycled content (PCR) targets | 2030 | Implementing act expected Dec 2026 |

    | Design for Recycling (DfR) | 2030 | Performance grade criteria pending |

    | Labelling requirements | 2028 | Harmonised pictograms in development |

    | Reusable packaging targets | 2030 | Focused on transport packaging |

    PCR content deserves particular caution. The calculation methodology and the equivalence criteria for recycled material sourced from third countries will only be settled in the implementing act expected in December 2026. Rushing to switch packaging materials now to hit a specific percentage is risky. The correct move at this stage is to record recycled-content input in a form that can later be substantiated. A supplier self-declaration alone will have to be re-collected once the implementing act is finalised.

    An EU "Branch" Does Not Qualify as an Importer

    The item with the widest cost variance is the Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) structure.

    When a third-country producer places packaging on the EU market for the first time, an Authorised Representative must be appointed in each Member State where the product is sold. A common practical misunderstanding arises here: a branch office in the EU has no separate legal personality and therefore does not qualify as an Importer. Companies that assume their German branch makes them the importer risk problems at registration on exactly this point, so confirm the legal form of your EU entity first.

    There are three options:

  • Establish an EU subsidiary: maximum control, but entity maintenance and accounting costs are substantial
  • Appoint an Authorised Representative: agency fees typically run EUR 1,000–3,000 per Member State per year, with EPR contributions charged separately
  • Transfer responsibility to the EU importer: lowest direct cost, but buyers frequently use it as leverage for price reductions
  • Costs scale linearly with the number of Member States you sell into. Selling in five countries means five registrations and five sets of contributions. A practical approach is to register in the two or three markets carrying the largest revenue share first, then expand.

    Contracts must be settled first. Incoterms (DDP, FOB and the like) allocate customs and transport responsibility — they do not allocate EPR responsibility or cost. If the contract does not state who registers and who pays the contributions, you have a dispute waiting to happen.

    Packaging Data Matters More Than Eco-Friendly Packaging

    Many companies interpret PPWR compliance as "switching to eco-friendly materials." What is actually needed first is a data system.

    The minimum data set to build:

  • A BOM for each packaging level (primary, secondary, transport)
  • Weight data by material — with composites broken out layer by layer
  • Material certificates and restricted-substance test reports
  • Recycled-content input ratios and the evidence supporting them
  • Companies that outsource packaging or work through OEMs are the most exposed, because in most cases they do not know the corrugated board grammage or the ink composition of the cartons arriving at their own warehouse. Build a standard template listing the documents to request, send it to all packaging suppliers at once, and write response deadlines and update cycles into the supply contracts.

    Only once this data is assembled can you produce the Technical Documentation and Declaration of Conformity. The order cannot be reversed. Claiming "eco-friendly packaging" without underlying data is unprovable, and that leads straight into greenwashing exposure. Environmental claims printed on packaging fall under EU green claims rules separately from PPWR labelling requirements, so an unsupported "recyclable" mark increases rather than reduces risk.

    A 90-Day Roadmap and the Support Programmes You Can Use

    Phase 1 (Days 0–30) — Establish the baseline

    Build a packaging inventory by export SKU and confirm your legal status in the EU (branch or incorporated entity). Compile the list of destination Member States and annual packaging weight placed on each market.

    Phase 2 (Days 31–60) — Secure the evidence

    Commission heavy metal and PFAS testing and collect supplier documentation. Begin Authorised Representative appointment and EPR registration in your highest-revenue Member States first.

    Phase 3 (Days 61–90) — Documentation and scenarios

    Set packaging redesign priorities (weigh material reduction against line changeover cost) and draft the technical documentation. Ahead of the PCR implementing act, pre-calculate the cost impact under several recycled-content ratio scenarios.

    A significant share of the cost can be offset through government programmes:

  • Export Voucher: covers restricted-substance testing and overseas certification under its certification and testing categories
  • ESG supply chain due diligence consulting: funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Resources and administered by the Korea Productivity Center — applicable to supply chain data system development
  • SME Innovation Voucher: supports packaging redesign and documentation under its consulting and technical support categories
  • ---

    Success under PPWR hinges not on swapping packaging materials but on holding packaging data in a form you can submit at any time. Without test reports and material data, no packaging choice can be substantiated; and a poorly structured EPR setup means costs compound with every additional Member State.

    The Korea Institute of Technology Innovation Management (KITIM) supports exporting SMEs with packaging data system development, supplier documentation request templates, technical documentation and Declaration of Conformity drafting, and EPR structure design — including matching you to applicable government support programmes. If you need help responding to EU packaging regulation, please get in touch.

    EU PPWRPackaging RegulationPackaging WasteRecycled ContentAuthorised RepresentativeSME ExportCircular EconomyESG Regulation
    매일 자동 업데이트

    이 분야 정부지원사업, AI가 찾아드립니다

    3분 기업진단만 완료하면 귀사에 맞는 공고를 적합도 점수와 함께 추천합니다. 무료입니다.

    AI 맞춤 공고 무료로 받기

    Need Consulting?

    Our technology innovation consultants will propose the optimal solution for your company.