Skip to content
Back to Blog
Smart Factory
2026-08-317 min read1

2026 SME Smart Service Support Program: Up to KRW 100 Million to Bring AI Beyond the Factory Floor

Korea's Smart Manufacturing Innovation framework includes a separate SME Smart Service track for non-manufacturing work, offering up to KRW 50 million for new deployments and KRW 100 million for upgrades. This guide covers how to design an eligible project and run it alongside the smart factory track.

KITIM Consulting Team

The Track Most Manufacturers Overlook

When companies review Korea's Smart Manufacturing Innovation programs, most focus on production equipment and MES deployment. What often goes unnoticed is that the same program framework includes a separate track: SME Smart Service Support.

While the smart factory track targets equipment and processes inside the plant, the smart service track funds ICT and AI solutions for non-manufacturing work that happens outside the factory floor — sales, logistics, after-sales service, and customer management. Manufacturers are fully eligible. The assumption that "we run a factory, so only the smart factory track applies to us" costs companies real opportunities every year.

Funding Scale and Eligibility

  • New deployment: up to 50% of total project cost, maximum KRW 50 million per company
  • Advancement (upgrade): up to 50% of total project cost, maximum KRW 100 million per company
  • Eligibility: SMEs as defined under Article 2 of the Framework Act on Small and Medium Enterprises
  • Application channel: the smart factory project management system (smb-service.kr)
  • Administering bodies: Ministry of SMEs and Startups; TIPA
  • The decisive review criterion is whether the project makes substantive use of advanced ICT such as big data and AI. Website redesigns or straightforward ERP replacements are at high risk of being ruled ineligible. The project should be designed not as a system swap, but as a change in how decisions get made, grounded in data.

    What Kinds of Projects Get Selected

    The application areas manufacturers most often pursue include:

  • Demand-forecast-driven inventory and ordering automation — learning from historical shipment data and seasonality to calculate safety stock automatically
  • AI-based quoting and cost estimation — deriving standard costs from drawings and specifications to shorten quote turnaround
  • Service history analysis and spare parts demand forecasting — securing parts by failure type in advance
  • Logistics and delivery route optimization
  • Automated customer inquiry handling
  • Service businesses — wholesale and retail, distribution, logistics, healthcare services — can take the same approach. In every case, however, the deciding factor is whether usable data already exists. Roughly one to two years of organized transaction or service history is what makes a project credible as feasible.

    If you are applying under the advancement category, you must state improvement metrics relative to your existing system. The rule is to express it numerically — not "we will add features," but "we will raise forecast accuracy from 72% to 85%."

    Running Two Tracks in Parallel

    It is entirely possible to split your application: the smart factory track for what happens inside the plant (equipment, processes), and the smart service track for what happens outside it (orders, inventory, customers). Before proceeding, confirm three things:

  • The duplicate funding restrictions in that year's official announcement
  • Whether a previously funded solution may be submitted again
  • A clear boundary so the functional scope of the two projects does not overlap
  • Most importantly, the two programs compound only when you design them around data integration. Forecast accuracy improves when production results generated by MES meet order and shipment data on the service side. Defining those connecting data fields at the application stage also makes post-completion performance reporting far easier.

    Where Applications Win or Lose Points

  • Problem definition: Quantify the current time, error rate, and cost of the work you intend to improve. "Quotes take 3.5 days on average, require two staff, and are reworked 12 times a month due to errors" is far more persuasive than a general description.
  • KPIs: State measurable quantitative targets together with how they will be measured. Targets without a measurement method lose points on feasibility.
  • Solution provider selection: Verify registration in the project management system and check for deployment experience in comparable industries.
  • Matching funds: Review your cash contribution ratio and readiness of expenditure documentation in advance.
  • What Determines the First Six Months After Go-Live

    The most common failure is straightforward: the system is built, and then no one enters the data. Without a designated owner and an input routine embedded in daily workflow, even a well-built forecasting model sits unused within months.

    The second is establishing a baseline. If you do not record your pre-deployment numbers, you have no way to demonstrate improvement in performance reporting. Measure and document current cycle times and error rates before the project begins.

    How KITIM Can Help

    KITIM supports companies at every stage — assessing which track fits your business, designing the project, preparing the business plan, matching you with solution providers, and managing post-deployment performance. If you are unsure which track works better for your company, we invite you to request a consultation.

    Smart ServiceSME Support ProgramAI AdoptionDigital TransformationGovernment Subsidy
    매일 자동 업데이트

    이 분야 정부지원사업, AI가 찾아드립니다

    3분 기업진단만 완료하면 귀사에 맞는 공고를 적합도 점수와 함께 추천합니다. 무료입니다.

    AI 맞춤 공고 무료로 받기

    Need Consulting?

    Our technology innovation consultants will propose the optimal solution for your company.